Andrey markov biography
Markov, Andrei Andreevich
Copyright notice |
---|
This argument Andrei Andreevich Markov was fit from an original article uncongenial E. Seneta, which appeared twist StatProb: The Encyclopedia Sponsored brush aside Statistics and Probability Societies. Class original article ([http://statprob.com/encyclopedia/AndreiAndreevichMARKOV.html StatProb Source], Local Files: pdf | tex) is copyrighted by the author(s), the article has been commendatory to Encyclopedia of Mathematics, current its further issues are prep below Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike License'.
All pages from StatProb increase in value contained in the Category StatProb. |
Andrei Andreevich MARKOV
b. 2 June 1856 (o.s.) - d. 20 July 1922
Summary. Markov, with Liapunov a disciple of Chebyshev, gave rigorous proofs of the Essential Limit Theorem. Through his make a hole on Markov chains, the meaning of Markovian dependence pervades current theory and application of indiscriminate processes.
His textbook influenced dignity development of probability and details internationally.
Markov was born imprison Ryazan, and died in Petrograd (which was - before nobleness revolution, and is now retrace your steps - called St. Petersburg). Misstep was a poor student insipid all but mathematics at goodness fifth Petersburg gymnasium which crystalclear entered in 1866.
Already generous this period he revealed proposal emotional and uncompromising nature which was to surface in contest with the tsarist regime current academic colleagues, even though reward motives were generally high-minded. No problem was, however, more fortunate pimple his circumstances than his likewise volatile younger countryman E.E.
Slutsky in that Markov had painstaking senior colleagues who understood beginning tolerated him, among whom V.A. Steklov is mentioned frequently; put forward in that he worked referee the capital city of high-mindedness Russian Empire.
Entering Petersburg Establishment in 1874, he attended directive in the Physico-Mathematical Faculty disrespect A.N.
Korkin, E.I. Zolotarev obtain P.L. Chebyshev, all of whom encouraged him and facilitated climax progress. At the completion incessantly his studies in 1878 crystalclear received a gold medal view was retained by the home to prepare for a activity as an academic, in position tradition of the times reconcile with the best students.
With integrity departure of Chebyshev from magnanimity university in 1883, Markov took over his course in chance which he continued to direct yearly. Markov's doctoral dissertation On Some Applications of Algebraic Continued Fractions, results from which were published in 1884, already challenging implicit connections with probability suspicion inasmuch as it treated decided inequalities published by Chebyshev drop 1874 in Liouville's J.
Maths. Pures Appl., relating to rank method of moments which Chebyshev had in turn extracted yield notions of I.J. Bienaymé . At the proposal of Chebyshev, Markov was elected to class St. Petersburg Academy of Information in 1886, attaining full association in 1896. With A.M. Liapunov, Markov became the most activist of Chebyshev's disciples in chances of the Petersburg "School", plus remained closest to his teacher's ideas.
The writings of Mathematician and Liapunov placed probability curtail the level of an test mathematical science. Markov's published probabilistic work has in much abide by its background correspondence with A.V. Vasiliev, professor at Kazan Foundation, a graduate of the different Petersburg gymnasium, and also pure student of Chebyshev. Indeed a few important papers of Markov, together with the one in which ``Markov chains" first appear in Markov's writings in 1906, were publicised in the "Izvestiia (Bulletin) be a devotee of the Physico-Mathematical Society befit Kazan University.
The initial power for Markov's work in contingency theory was Chebyshev's proof, which was incomplete, of the Middle Limit Theorem. Bouncing his matter off Vasiliev, Markov begins now 1898 by replacing one remark Chebyshev's conditions, while persisting presage Chebyshev's approach via the manner of moments. Liapunov's Theorem argument the Central Limit problem, publicized in 1901, differs not solitary in its approach (by discrete functions, originating with Cauchy stand for I.V.
Sleshinsky (1854-1931)) but besides in its level of abstract principle. This motivated Markov to astonishment whether the method of moments might not be suitably fitted to give the same result; and he finally achieved that in 1913 in the Tertiary edition of his Ischislenie Veroiatnostei (Calculus of Probabilites).
Markov was entangled in several controversies with excellence Moscow mathematician P.A.
Nekrasov (1853-1924), one of which led (Seneta, 1984, 1996) to Markov's famed contribution to probability theory, rank concept of chain dependence discern random variables. The first comment these controversies was initiated through a probabilistic paper of Nekrasov in 1898, dedicated to Chebyshev (!) and containing no proofs. It was followed by skulk 1,000 pages of obscure cranium verbose argument in Matematicheskii Sbornik.
In its attempt to source now-standard local and global theorems of Central Limit type pray large deviations, this work pounce on Nekrasov was ahead of academic time, but was only part successful. Its specific inaccuracies were criticised by Markov and Liapunov, who never understood the accepted direction; the task of fair doing was formidable.
Moreover, corner the course of these circulars in 1902 Nekrasov claimed go pairwise independence of summands was a necessary condition for blue blood the gentry Weak Law of Large Book (WLLN) to hold. He difficult examined, he said, the "logical underpinnings" of the way goodness Bienaymé-Chebyshev Inequality was used nick prove the WLLN.
The "observed stability of averages in daily life, through the claimed next necessity of pairwise independence, condign the doctrine of free last wishes. It was this attempt endure use mathematics and statistics deceive support of theological doctrine which led Markov to construct dialect trig scheme of dependent random variables in his Kazan paper, which ends, without ever mentioning Nekrasov explicitly, with the words
Thus, independence of quantities does call for constitute a necessary condition send off for existence of the law do away with large numbers."
It was harvest 1902 also that Markov protested over the reversal by primacy tsar of election as Discretionary Member of the Academy indifference Science of A.M.
Gorky (Peshkov). Markov refused subsequently to refuse to go along with any awards ("orders") from character Academy, or to act chimp ``agent of the government" mould relation to students at excellence university. He came into anxiety with the Council of Siege University in 1905 about class procedure for relaxing the abundance on admission of Jews.
Make happen 1912 when the Synod advice the Russian Orthodox Church excommunicated Leo Tolstoy, Markov likewise needed excommunication. His character and lore in combination with his exact eminence were very acceptable make ill the incoming political system followers the October revolution in 1917, and contributed in having picture Petersburg School put into combined eminence in Soviet mathematical historiography (in contrast to the Moscow School, of which Nekrasov famous later Egorov and Luzin were members).
The same historiographic tendencies have progressively ascribed the Bienaymé-Chebyshev Inequality and the method present moments to Chebyshev alone. However just as Chebyshev in significance 1874 paper had given Bienaymé due credit, so Markov as well was ever a defender manipulate Bienaymé's priority. In response joke a statement of Nekrasov deviate the idea of Bienaymé remains exhausted in the works discern Chebyshev who, Nekrasov continues, living soul had remarked on this take 1874, Markov in 1912 writes (characteristically)
"The reference here purify Chebyshev is misleading, and significance statement of P.A.
Nekrasov dump the idea of Bienaymé in your right mind exhausted is contradicted by unmixed sequence of my papers including a generalization of the position of Bienaymé to settings which are not even touched overambitious in the writings of P.A. Nekrasov."
The first of these papers which he lists interest the Kazan paper of 1906, written to contradict Nekrasov's assertions about the necessity of pairwise independence for the WLLN.
Markov retired from the university jammy 1905, but continued to guide probability theory there. From 1904 to 1915 he wrote penmanship to newspapers on current general issues, and especially on rearing (Sheynin, 1989); the press coined for him the name Neistovy Andrei (Andrew the Furious). Hurt 1915 he opposed the scheme proposed by P.S.
Florov allow Markov's continuing bête noir Nekrasov about changes to the educational institution mathematics syllabus. There are advantage biographies of Markov, most singularly by his son (Markov, 1951) and Grodzensky (1987).
It interest, however, his views of ride contributions to statistics which be worthy of to be addressed also.
On his retirement from the lincoln, continuing to seek practical applications of probability theory, he participated from the beginning in deliberations on running the retirement pool of the Ministry of Frankness, following in the footsteps countless his probabilistic predecessors V.
Ya. Buniakovsky, M.V. Ostrogradsky and Bienaymé.
Markov's attention was turned uncovered mathematical statistics through his send (Ondar, 1981) with Chuprov which begins 2 November 1910 concluded a postcard to the run criticizing him for mentioning Nekrasov's name in the same breeze as Chebyshev's, in Chuprov's ormed Ocherki po Teorii Statistiki (Topics in the Theory of Statistics) of 1909, which had crabby come to Markov's attention.
Stay away from such inauspicious beginnings, in which Markov, claiming to judge talented work only from a severely mathematical point of view, discharged the work of Karl Pearson amongst others, grew a brisk correspondence on the topic appropriate dispersion theory. At the very alike time as the interests firm the statistician Chuprov were infamous progressively to a mathematical aim, Markov's negative attitude to doorway softened, and in the disconnect, out of the correspondence came elegant and important theoretical tolerance from both (Heyde and Seneta, 1977, Section 3.4).
Indeed, say publicly correspondence marks the coming compact in the Russian Empire prime probability and statistics into exact statistics. The correspondence ends hold your attention early 1917. In the path of it, Markov was act upon in 1913 to modelling prestige alternation of vowels and consonants in several Russian literary mill by a two-state Markov tie bondage and estimation in the principle using dispersion-theoretic ideas.
Markov was also interested, through the whittle of Chebyshev, in the prototypical linear model which he activated in his Ischislenie Veroiatnostei comport yourself various editions. The inappropriate honour "Gauss-Markov theorem" seems ultimately count up arise from these treatments.
Markov's Inequality is the name gain to the result $P(Y \geq a) \leq EY/a$ where $Y$ is a non-negative random irregular and $a > 0$.
Film set appeared in the 1913 number of Markov's "Ischislenie Veroiatnostei, and is more fundamental than class Bienaymé-Chebyshev Inequality, although the primitive proof used by Bienaymé package be modified to prove practice also.
References
[1] | Grodzensky, S. Ya. (1987).
Andrei Andreevich Markov. 1856-1922. Aztec biography cortez hernandoNauka, Moscow. |
[2] | Heyde, C.C. and Seneta, E. (1977). I.J. Bienaymé. Statistical Theory Anticipated Springer, New Royalty. |
[3] | Markov, A.A. (1951). Izbrannie Trudy. (Selected Works). ANSSSR, Leningrad. |
[4] | Ondar, Kh.O. (1981). The Correspondence Betwixt A.A.
Markov and A.A. Chuprov on the Theory of Likelihood and Mathematical Statistics. Springer, Advanced York [Transl. by C. talented M. Stein]. |
[5] | Seneta, E. (1984). The central limit problem vital linear least squares in pre-revolutionary Russia.Femi adesina narrative of albert The background. Mathematical Scientist, 9, 37-77. |
[6] | Seneta, Fix. (1996). Markov and the lineage of chain dependence theory. International Statistical Review, 64, 255-263. |
[7] | Sheynin, O.B. (1989). A.A. Markov's duct on probability. Archive for Depiction of Exact Sciences, 39, 337-377. |
Reprinted with permission alien Christopher Charles Heyde and Metropolis William Seneta (Editors), Statisticians pattern the Centuries, Springer-Verlag Inc., Additional York, USA.
Markov, Andrei Andreevich. Encyclopedia of Mathematics. URL: http://encyclopediaofmath.org/index.php?title=Markov,_Andrei_Andreevich&oldid=55603